<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
	<channel>
		<title>Add-Art Forums &#187; Tag: legal advertising - Recent Topics</title>
		<link>http://forum.add-art.org/tags/legal-advertising</link>
		<description>replace ads with art</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
				<atom:link href="http://forum.add-art.org/rss/tags/legal-advertising/topics" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>ldawson on "Legality of blocking"</title>
			<link>http://forum.add-art.org/topic/legality-of-blocking#post-169</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ldawson</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">169@http://forum.add-art.org/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm wondering if any legal issues have come up in the blocking and replacing of advertisement.  Have there ever been lawsuits from people who paid to have their ads on websites and are basically throwing away their money when it's not being seen.  Not that I personally think they would have a leg to stand on in a legal battle.</p>
<p>I hadn't thought about it, but I was telling people how excited I was by my add-art, and one person at an advertising agency mentioned this issue.</p>
<p>Anyone know?</p>
<p>thanks<br />
lisa
</p>]]></description>
					</item>

	</channel>
</rss>

