Add-Art Forums » Tag: animation - Recent Posts http://forum.add-art.org/tags/animation replace ads with art en-US Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:32:07 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1 Steve on "SWF or animated GIF?" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/swf-or-animated-gif#post-574 Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:16:15 +0000 Steve 574@http://forum.add-art.org/ Glad you like it. To clear up a couple things...

1. It's not a product, it's a project. We're not selling anything, you're not buying anything. It's a gift.

2. The goal was never to not distract anyone. Please read the last paragraph (pasted below) from this NY Times article from 2007 http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/14/technology/14adblock.html

“If you hate the artwork, there is a way you could turn it off until the show was over,” Mr. Lambert said. “I don’t make money from this, so if it bothers some people, that’s O.K. Art should bother some people.”

]]> blyrehs on "SWF or animated GIF?" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/swf-or-animated-gif#post-573 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:01:42 +0000 blyrehs 573@http://forum.add-art.org/ I realize this post is dated a year past but I would like to add that having the gif flashing while I'm trying to read an article is as distracting as the ads. As with the twirling crystal I had to place my hand over to cover it so I could read. Otherwise, I've enjoyed your product for quite awhile now. Thanks!

]]> red on "Where is the location the .jar image files are stored?" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/where-is-the-location-the-jar-image-files-are-stored#post-505 Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:07:54 +0000 red 505@http://forum.add-art.org/ Animation is back, so I will bump for great justice.

]]> anonysumo on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-503 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:52:51 +0000 anonysumo 503@http://forum.add-art.org/ More animation. Thanks and goodbye.

]]> genericuser on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-494 Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:36:25 +0000 genericuser 494@http://forum.add-art.org/ I, too, am really disappointed with the ad hominem attacks on the artist and on Steve. Steve doesn't at all seem "defensive" -- he comes across, to me, as someone trying to explain what the purpose of the add-on is. And the art is not "stupid" -- it's just not to your taste.

I am an art history professor, and this kind of discussion reminds me why I make my students have discussions, every semester, about what constitutes "art." The discussion, it seems, continues -- and maybe explains why fluffy, feel-good mall art such as that by the Thomas Kincade brand continues to outsell and outpace the sales of any other artist in the world. There's already enough franchise, brand art in the world. Can't we have some space for some real thought for a change?

Keep up the good work, Add-Art!! I, for one, am now a committed supporter. And WAY TO GO, Steve, for sticking to your guns!

]]> Steve on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-467 Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:13:09 +0000 Steve 467@http://forum.add-art.org/ thanks heartface

]]> heartface on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-466 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:27:07 +0000 heartface 466@http://forum.add-art.org/ I just read this. I love your position, Steve. I want to notice the art and to think about it. I also love that you don't treat this like a product. I want to be challenged. This is seriously one of my favorite things on the internet right now.

<3<3

]]> Linda on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-441 Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:22:38 +0000 Linda 441@http://forum.add-art.org/ You can turn off almost all animations in Firefox:

1. In the address bar, type about:config, and then press Enter.
2. Scroll down to image.animation_mode.
3. Right-click the value, click Modify, type "none" or "once" (without the quotation marks), and then click OK.

Note: "none" means that an animation won't play at all; "once" means that it will play once and then stop; and "normal" means, well, normal animation.

]]> Steve on "Where is the location the .jar image files are stored?" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/where-is-the-location-the-jar-image-files-are-stored#post-411 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:59:07 +0000 Steve 411@http://forum.add-art.org/ it's not a secret and I didn't say code was necessary to do it.

What I said was, "start getting to know the code" so you can make contributions instead of complaining and/or shaking hands.

Here's the ticket:
http://dev.eyebeam.org/projects/add-art/ticket/21

Get on our dev email list, read up on the wiki, and start writing code and testing. I'd love to incorporate one of your patches in the next release. Sincerely, I WOULD LOVE IT.

]]> red on "Where is the location the .jar image files are stored?" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/where-is-the-location-the-jar-image-files-are-stored#post-410 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:44:14 +0000 red 410@http://forum.add-art.org/ Solution provided with no guarantee.

I think I figured it out.
Close Firefox first. The .jar that contains the images is in the \extensions\development@add-art.org\ directory within your profile directory (\Documents and Settings\user\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\) at least for me ff3 XP SP3 by default. once you replace the images.jar with what ever .jar file you have. After that go into the .jar and extract the .ds_store file from within the .jar to the same directory you replaced the images.jar, replacing the current file.

Restart Firefox and presto! You now have Choice. No coding involved for those who CAN'T code. I will personally shake the hand of the person that gets this coded into the next release.

If anyone tries this please post the results.

]]> Steve on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-409 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:14:24 +0000 Steve 409@http://forum.add-art.org/ @red -

We have a solid 4 star review and our user numbers are not going down. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/statistics/addon/6846

If you want to see options for art feeds you don't need to convince anyone here, we need code not complaints.

Open source isn't about forking projects you don't like. You build together. Help us build.

]]> Steve on "Where is the location the .jar image files are stored?" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/where-is-the-location-the-jar-image-files-are-stored#post-408 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:09:23 +0000 Steve 408@http://forum.add-art.org/ I get your point, but you say it like I haven't mentioned more than once that we want to enable users to select from multiple sources. Code speaks louder than words.

If you want to know where the .jar file is, start by getting to know the code:
http://dev.eyebeam.org/projects/add-art/wiki/How%20To%20Contribute?id=22

]]> red on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-407 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:04:50 +0000 red 407@http://forum.add-art.org/ @sarah
If you don't believe me go look at the ratings! https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6846

I don't care if you want to drive away the mainstream, but you should say it upfront. I could care less if you do or don't like a set, many users want a choice. I'm sure you don't listen to 1 radio station for 2 weeks or watch 1 TV channel for 2 weeks. People want a choice. That is what drew people to Firefox to begin with. They don't like it when you tell them (I am paraphrasing here), Don't like the art? Tough! turn it off! See you in 2 weeks!

If most of the users complain I'm sure other alternatives to this software will appear. Especially when the software is open source. Then your venue will have less of an audience.

]]> sarah on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-406 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:48:25 +0000 sarah 406@http://forum.add-art.org/ Hi all,
as a former (and future) Add-Art curator who is responsible for a show people loved (soothing mountain views by Monica Studer and Christoph van den Berg) and a show people, let's say, were irked by (photographs from the election campaign by Jon Winet) I want to say, for the record, I bloody love this animation show. I think it's awesome! It's been a total delight on otherwise mindless web-trawling sessions, to have my attention drawn to these fantastic and funny drawings by Adam.
I think the sentiment that a single artist's work could discredit an entire community is just a tad far-fetched. I'm all for a single artist's work completely redefining what art means, renegotiating all the possible spaces art can inhabit, and reconfiguring the brains of people who look at it.
love Sarah

]]> red on "Where is the location the .jar image files are stored?" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/where-is-the-location-the-jar-image-files-are-stored#post-405 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:27:20 +0000 red 405@http://forum.add-art.org/ The idea of add-art is fantastic. The questionable set isn't really great imo. With that said instead of going without art for 2 weeks, where is the directory that add-art places the .jar?

@Steve There are several stations on the radio and TV. There are other galleries than the ones featured at a show/museum. WE don't need to be locked into a single gallery for 2 weeks.

]]> Steve on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-404 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:26:07 +0000 Steve 404@http://forum.add-art.org/ @red, keep it civil.

]]> red on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-403 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:58:53 +0000 red 403@http://forum.add-art.org/ @Steve I didn't see any forum rules. I'll take it that freedom of speech is a form of art and I will subject anyone who reads this post to it. With that said, if you are still reading this, you don't have to! I'm not shooting the messenger ;) as you so stated here --> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6846

@theworldofadam
Boo! You are not welcome! Thanks for bringing me to remove this add-on! I pray that we never have to see this type of "art" again! Those people out there that wanted an alternative to ads only got smacked just because they wasted their time installing this add-on. The poor reviews of this add-on can be directly correlated to your set of "art". Thanks for discrediting this add-on in the online community. With that said, I can't wait for the next set of art so long as it isn't worse than your set.

]]> theworldofadam on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter/page/2#post-402 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:55:00 +0000 theworldofadam 402@http://forum.add-art.org/ Hey Forum. Adam here. As BCAST on Add-Art comes to a close, I'd like to take the opportunity to thank Steve for supporting this project and encouraging me to do what I want within its parameters, as well as offer some thoughts as well.

I think part of what makes add-art, and the internet so fascinating, is the manner in which still and moving images are presented simultaneously, all with competing voices, all of them trying to get your attention, all trying to draw you in another direction. I've really enjoyed having the chance to use add art to reconfigure and unite these ad spaces to my own means and images.

As Steve observed, Add Add provides image and animation replacement. Its primary purpose is not to block ads, because there are already applications that provide these services. Considering this, I decided to make something that would be hard to tune out. I included GIFs because they are ubiquitous in web travels. In my mind, to ignore their presence and potential is to close a door on its possibilities. If anything, there will be more video and animation online in the future, and honestly, I couldn't resist putting my own stamp on their use. Clearly, this got under some peoples skin, and others didn't mind, and still others liked it. And a lot of those that didn't like it posted. : )

So as this draws to a close, I'd like to thank you for your browsers. I hope you'll come back next week if you were frustrated, I'm glad if you liked it, and I hope you will continue to support Add Art.

Best,
Adam Shecter

]]> Steve on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-401 Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:01:25 +0000 Steve 401@http://forum.add-art.org/ @sdkippy - what you see as an obvious exception other people love. Like I said, user numbers aren't going down. I've received more than one email describing this show as "the best show ever" etc. Yeah, some don't like it, and I totally understand why (though I disagree). And then there's this on twitter:

bitless: liking the current add-art show, fun stuff and still has banner-nature somehow http://is.gd/sNiO (expand) the shows too far from banners feel odd

celci: The current add-art show is crackin' me up: http://add-art.org/

Anyway, it's moot. There's a new show in 3 days.

And, as I've said before, if you wanna contribute code, or propose you're own show, there is an open invitation.

]]> sdkippy on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-400 Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:55:32 +0000 sdkippy 400@http://forum.add-art.org/ "Art should bother some people.". I mean come on. Yes art can/should offend some people or bother them emotionally etc. But you have to agree this is different. This is annoying us by distracting us as we do our work or we are reading the news etc. Its actively annoying us. We cant simply ignore it because its frickin moving!
You should seriously listen to your users. Steve: you have missed the point if you honestly think the statement "Art should bother some people." is applicable in this situation.

]]> Steve on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-399 Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:18:47 +0000 Steve 399@http://forum.add-art.org/ I ask because I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding about the purpose of the plugin. It is not intended to be wallpaper at all. It is called Add-*Art* for a reason. Before the plugin was even made, the New York Times asked me "what if people don't like the art" and this is what I said:

“If you hate the artwork, there is a way you could turn it off until the show was over,” Mr. Lambert said. “I don’t make money from this, so if it bothers some people, that’s O.K. Art should bother some people.”

So when people get upset because they don't like the art, and expect satisfaction, or expect me or anyone else to react and "fix" it, it still strikes me as a misunderstanding.

We do 26 different shows a year. I think this marks the one year anniversary of public release and this is the first animation show. During the course of this show there has been no significant change in the number of users. If for two weeks a few people really don't like a show, then that's fine. Just turn it off and come back later - it's as simple as that.

]]> frankjones on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-395 Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:10:45 +0000 frankjones 395@http://forum.add-art.org/ @Steve re:what do you see the purpose of the plugin as?

Honestly, I am really surprised that you would ask this question.

Let me quote from the main page (you probably wrote it!)

AddArt is a Firefox extension which replaces advertising images on web pages with art images from a curated database.

80-90% of the advertisement images that are being replaced are being replaced because they are amazingly irritating and stupid. They flash. They wiggle. They move to and fro. The only thing worse are the fly out ones.

So when you use animated artwork to replace these ads, it's like replacing a mugger with a guy holding a gun. There isn't much difference.

Again, I am actually amazed that you would even pose this question to us. So, just in case you missed the vast majority opinion here - most of the users of addart do NOT like animated artwork as an offering. I counted at least 4 people who created an account for the explicit purpose of stating this in the forum - myself included.

Honestly, I have nothing against the current artist or his work. But, it just is not the right venue to show off what he creates.

]]> anonysumo on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-394 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:06:25 +0000 anonysumo 394@http://forum.add-art.org/ I'll speak for myself at least, about the "purpose of the plugin." Art isn't what I primarily look for when I open my browser. It's a stimulating alternative to ads, but at my discretion. Unless I want to look at art, it's wallpaper, and now it's making it hard to concentrate on reading anything.

]]> Steve on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-392 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:38:13 +0000 Steve 392@http://forum.add-art.org/ @dangeroustype - "Animations are distracting and defeat the whole purpose of this plugin."

I want to tease this out a little, what do you see the purpose of the plugin as?

]]> dangeroustype on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-391 Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:03:32 +0000 dangeroustype 391@http://forum.add-art.org/ I would like to add my voice to the discussion too. Animated art is very annoying. How can I read the NY Times when there's animated gifs flashing next to it?

I think the art is great, if they were not moving frenetically I couldn't care less.

Animations are distracting and defeat the whole purpose of this plugin. On the shows before, the ads would give a different "feel" to the Internet, as all the ad boxes would show awesome artwork. This time, it feels like the whole Internet is alive with 90s-style flashing GIFs that make it impossible to read websites. Not okay.

I don't want a different source for the shows, the shows are great. I want to either be able to disable the flashing gifs (maybe show only the first frame of the animation) or have there be a non-moving art only rule.

]]> EasyTarget on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-389 Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:27:05 +0000 EasyTarget 389@http://forum.add-art.org/ Fascinating discussion; I'm really glad to see people defending this here! And Steve's points (and link to the FAQ) are well made. I understand and agree with the sentiments, but.. Clumsy rapid animation simply distracts(*) without adding much value.

IMHO :-)

EZ.

Oh; and finally; a technical point. The FAQ is not linked from the http://www.add-art.org homepage.. maybe it should be.

(*) That is why it is beloved by the sadder sort of marketing muppets.

]]> a bill miller on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-388 Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:57:54 +0000 a bill miller 388@http://forum.add-art.org/ whatever
This add-art show is awesome!
Its so much fun... Thanks so much for having a good sense of humor.
I def don't understand complaints about awesome airquotes and a hammer smashing its head against the internet.

]]> Steve on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-387 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:02:02 +0000 Steve 387@http://forum.add-art.org/ By the way, anyone who has posted on here is more than welcome to propose a show...

]]> dannynoonan on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-386 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:32:02 +0000 dannynoonan 386@http://forum.add-art.org/ I totally agree with (pretty much) everyone else-- this animated art is just terrible. This was a bad choice. I've already disabled Add-art. I hope I remember to turn it back on in two weeks.

Please don't do this again.

]]> sutcas on "NEW ART - from animator Adam Shecter" http://forum.add-art.org/topic/new-art-from-animator-adam-shecter#post-384 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:10:58 +0000 sutcas 384@http://forum.add-art.org/ I installed Add-Art recently and I loved the concept but I was worried that I wouldn't like the art. I expected "serene landscapes" and "pleasant" works - boring and uninspiring. I like art that is created by experimenting and taking risks. The current art is indeed extremely annoying, but at least it's interesting. It takes the idea of subverting advertising techniques to another level. People have been reacting to it strongly because "annoying" is what they were trying to escape. Those people who don't appreciate innovation and risk-taking (even when it backfires horribly) should just stick to AdBlock.

]]>